Mel’s Book Meme: Ze Villianous Villain of Villainy

Terpsichore has given an excellent outline of  a “Villain”, and I find myself with really nothing to add.

Except, perhaps, to utter the injunction, “Oh villain! thou wilt be condemned into everlasting redemption for this!”

Dogberry’s misspeaking aside, The Villain of my nightmares is not going anywhere near redemption.

He is a man, who presumably started life as a human, but choose evil so willingly and wholeheartedly that he can barely identified as such anymore. In fact, it is suspected that the devil has given him a third eye so as to better see and manipulate people.

He is:

Mr. Jackman,
from Russell Kirk’s Old House Of Fear

Kirk, better known for his philosophy, economics, and literary commentary, loved ghost tales. He discovered them during his sojourn at the University of St. Andrews, where he was surrounded by the ghostiness of the town. (St. A’s is known for being haunted.)

And Kirk’s taste for the sublime spooks came out in his fiction. He is, (as Lewis says of MacDonald,) perhaps not the best writer but he is a great teller of myth. All of his tales are chilling, but in a very good way.

Each is shot through a sense of the otherworldly, where the possibilities of meeting  a devil or meeting an angel walk side by side.

Each is told from a human standing: imperfect but trying, and oh, so very mortal.

And each highlights the dangers of Evil on the immortal soul. From the ghosts of thieves, to the possessing spirits of truly fiendish mobsters, Kirk’s stories create an intense interior repulsion from all things devilish.

The tales are told in such away that the reader is not sure what is happening, or if there is even something truly diabolical going on. But the little twists and turns that the plot takes slowly uncovers the supernatural working. Every story has surprised me in some way. But none laid a chilly finger on my spine the that my first Kirk story did.

This a Gothic Romance, written because Kirk simply wanted to see if he could write one.

Old House of Fear is narrated from the point of view of a prosaic American Lawyer, Mr. Logan, on a business trip to buy a castle. He gets stranded on the island off the coast of Scotland where this castle resides, with the dying owner, her beautiful niece, and Mr. Jackson. And Mr. Jackson’s henchmen. And Angus the shepherd.

But mostly Mr. Jackman. Mr. Edmund Jackman, who wants the castle, the niece, and the money. And can use evil powers to get it all.

Mr. Logan starts the story denying the possibility of any hocus-pocus. But as he becomes involved, he slowly becomes convinced of the actual, real, palpable existence of Evil. (And the fact that that wrinkle in Mr. Jackman’s forehead is really the lid for his third eye.)

There is terror, evil, a beautiful girl, midnight romps across a storm-tossed island, Scottish accents, and bottle dungeon.

(The bottle dungeon is modeled after the one in the Castle in St. Andrews!)

And the best part is, the Good wins! Mr. Jackman faces the eternal consequences of his choices. Logan gets the girl. And everything is resolved in a way that brings not only narrative and literary but spiritual satisfaction. For not being explicit Christian in any fashion, there is still an underlying system of belief. A portrayal of the Devils assumes the presence of the True God.

So the memory of Mr. Jackman remains to remind me that not only is Evil real, it is vanquishable.

About these ads

7 thoughts on “Mel’s Book Meme: Ze Villianous Villain of Villainy

  1. “The takes are told” typo?

    Another I am unfamiliar with. I don’t do well with horror, but I have a good Southerner’s love of the gothic. Blood-chilling villains are so compelling.

    • Thanks! Corrected!

      I dislike horror stories normally, but something about Kirk’s are quite compelling. He can create atmosphere that at once reminds you of your own humanity, and also of the otherness of another world. It is frightening, but doesn’t leave you feeling sick at the end.

      And really, anything by Kirk is wonderful. His biography of T.S. Eliot is the best out there.

  2. Awesome choice!

    I made a study of Dr. Kirk’s ghostly tales a few years back, and prior to that I had the pleasure of listening to him tell a few of his ghost stories. He believed in ghostly apparitions as much as he believed in the soul, which is to say that both were merely a matter of fact. His apparitional orations were his own experiences–the face of a deceased relative in the window of the ancestral home, or a centuries old victim encountered in a dark stone alley in St. Andrews–and tended to be fragmentary stories, not Hollywood horror.

    His fiction, the short stories and novels, are complex with much that is unexpected, but still with a factual, realistic complexion. The horror lies not in fanstastical projections, but in the realization that evil is real, and opposed to anything good.

    Any of his stories are worthy of curling up with, preferably next to the fire in an old wing-back chair and read by candle light.

  3. And, I should add, that he would have taken a personal delight in having caused a chill to ripple through the reader’s spine!

  4. Hm, he sounds like an author I’ll have to seek out. Especially for the St Andrews connection! Because honestly, for all its rumored ghostliness, St Andrews was almost pure romance and poetry to me. True, the wind whistled by the walls of my corner of Old Hall with a peculiarly ghostly sound unique in the entire building, but to me it just felt charming rather than ominous. I was too in love with the place to fear it at all. And while I doubt that’ll change soon, I nonetheless would like to see it from someone else’s eyes.

  5. Pingback: Conclusion « Egotist's Club

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s